        
  
   
| |

| DuraCooler®
Sizing Sheet(s) |
 |
English |
online
|
|
| |
Spanish |
online
|
|
| |
Portuguese
|
online
|
|
 |
|
| DuraCooler®
CD Drawings |
| |
If you are a commercial boat builder or designer and would like to
receive our DuraCooler® CD-ROM, (includes drawings to scale). Click Here to register.
|
DuraCooler®
Installation Manual |
| |
|
(download
PDF) |
|
|
- 90/10
cupro-nickel tubing is resistant to waterflow erosion and
serves as an antifoulant.
- Compact,
one-piece design makes installation simple.
- Streamlined
header design reduces pressure drop in water flowing through
the cooler. External water travels more quickly to tubes
increasing the heat transfer efficiency of the cooler.
- Custom-sized
for your engine specifications and operational requirements.
- Available
with through-hull type fittings or non-through-hull flanges.
- PATENT
PENDING.
Tube
Cooler Success / Major
Breakthrough
Testing Results /
Commitment to Design
|
|
|
| |
Success
of the Rectangular Tube Cooler
- In 1946,
the first rectangular tube keel cooler came to the marine market.
- For nearly
half a century, this design has enjoyed considerable success in
the marine industry for keel cooling of heat sources on marine
vessels.
- This type
of cooler has been successful in the marine industry for three
reasons:
- Large amounts
of tubing surface area in a relatively small, compact footprint.
This equates to a highly efficient heat exchange device.
- Durability
of design: In many applications, the design has with stood
more than twenty years of continuous use in severe marine environments.
- Ease
of installation: Shipyard workers appreciate the ease of installation
of the one piece keel cooler.
back to top
|
|
| |
First
Major Breakthrough in Keel Cooling Technology
- In 1997,
Duramax® Marine LLC initiated a research and development
program to identify opportunities to improve the operational
efficiency of the square-headed outboard keel cooler.
- Finite
element computer studies were conducted to determine internal
and external flow patterns, pressure drop and heat transfer characteristics
for different heat exchanger geometries.
- Flow pattern
studies determined that the outside tubes, tubes number 1 and
number 8, (the outside tubes) in the square-headed keel cooler
tested were being used inefficiently despite the fact these
tubes have the greatest potential heat rejection per linear foot.
- The design
of the existing square header is the reason for this inefficiency.
- Duramax®
Marine LLC immediately began to develop a more efficient header
design.
- Duramax®
Marine LLC engineered the new streamlined header design to further
enhance interior and exterior flow patterns and, at the
same time, reduce the overall pressure drop within the
keel cooler unit.
- In initial
testing, the design also increased coolant flow to the outside
tubes that had been used less efficiently in the traditional
keel cooler design.
- Coolant
flow distribution in the outer tubes increased 35% after
the geometry modifications.
- Heat rejection
in the outer tubes jumped 45%.
- Overall
heat transfer in the DuraCooler® SC-48-96 increased
17% over the square-headed unit of equal size in initial testing.
- The DuraCooler®
design with increased coolant flow to the outside tubes
will result in smaller
units versus traditional square headers and
lower costs.
- Overall
footprint may be reduced as much as 42% in
some units.
(see graphs below)
back to top
|
|
 |
Testing
Results
|
|
Traditional
Design Tested
|
DuraCooler®
|
Computer
modeling of the traditional design keel cooler tested showed poor
coolant flow through tubes 1 & 8.
|
DuraCooler®
header design change produced an increase of 35% in the outside
tubes.
|
Traditional
Design Tested
|
DuraCooler®
|
Computer
modeling of the traditional design keel cooler tested indicated
the outside tubes were being used least efficiently even
though these tubes had the greatest potential heat rejection
per linear foot.
|
DuraCooler®
header design increased heat transfer in the outside tubes by
45%!
|
| |
Note:
Study above conducted on a SC-48-96 and equivalent size square-head
unit.
Studies conducted by: Flow Simulations Inc. e-mail: info@flowsimulations.com
|
|
 |
Overall
heat transfer in the DuraCooler SC-48-96 increased by 17% over the
square-headed, traditional design keel cooler unit tested of equal
size in initial testing. |
|
Back
to top
| |
Commitment
to Design Improvements
- Duramax® Marine LLC, with promising results from the finite
element testing proceeded to the next phase of testing, actual
unit testing in its research pond.
- In 1998, Duramax® Marine LLC built an 800,000-gallon
testing facility to better emulate marine conditions in a
controlled environment.
- Testing facility can test keel coolers 20 feet long and
weighing as much as two tons.
- Temperature drop, pressure drop and flow rates are monitored
and recorded.
- Initial tests on the same size square-head keel cooler that
was tested in the laboratory validated the computerized testing.
|
 |
|
Back
to top
contact
us | relationships | products
| innovations | trade
shows | home
bearings | cooling
systems | sealing systems
fendering systems
Duramax® Marine LLC 17990 Great Lakes Parkway
Hiram, OH 44234 USA
Phone: 440.834.5400 Fax: 440.834.4950 or Fax: 800.497.9283 (US and Canada)
© 2002, Duramax® Marine LLC. All rights reserved.
DuraCooler is Patent Pending.
|